Raw photo metadata can therefore be embedded in jpeg photos. Or, metadata is not updated without applying a very unintuitive As you may see in the Dropbox files jpeg metadata is overwritten by raw metadata in what are suppose to be jpeg blocks. Unfortunately it seems that contradictory metadata is written. Structure of the files even appears to be similar between what digiKam creates and ON1 creates (to an end-user, perhaps not a developer/programmer). xmp) that ON1 uses, that the sidecars would be interchangeable.
I was thinking that given the configuration option “use a compatible file name for writing sidecar files”, and digiKam creating files using the extensions (.on1 &. Subject: Re: Keyword (metadata) consistency between programs If there isĬontradictory information between both, I am not sure to which one DigikamĬan you attach us an example of a picture and its sidecars (.xmp and. Picture itself (but not the RAW, usually), so digikam and other softwaresĬan read that information without the need of a xmp sidecar. Moreover, the information of the XMP sidecar can also be embedded in the JPG Tag block (as long as there isn't contradictory information). Shouldn't be a problem, so I wouldn't be worried if you see a JPG and RW2 Order to be compatible with lots of other picture managers, and usually that I know that digikam uses a bunch of redundant keyword tags in I am not sure about the correct blocks that jpg and RAW photos should or So if you edit some keywords inĭigikam, store them in a. Not only include metadata (like keywords and dates) but also informationĪbout the editions done on the photo. on1 sidecars are exclusive to the ON1 photo editor, so Iĭon't think Digikam is able to read or produce them. Ok, this is a bit complex, so I am not sure if I'll miss something.īasically you want to be able to interoperate between ON1 photo editor, andĪs far as I know. On1 2020 now displays the raw photo keyword for both the jpg and raw photo. xmp sidecar the jpg photo keyword is replaced by the raw photo keyword in all 6 blocks. on1 sidecar still has the original jpg keyword in both the jpg and raw blocks. Photo for both the jpg and raw (rw2) photos.Ģ)Adding a keyword to a raw photo in dK (after. xmp sidecar used (I think) by On1 for only raw photo metadata. MicrosoftPhoto:LastKeywordXMP, digiKam:TagsList, lr:hierarchicalSubject, mediapro:CatalogSets & dc:subject, all containing the keyword. xmp sidecar has 6 keyword tag blocks: Acdsee, The jpg photo keyword is added to both the jpg and raw (rw2) tag block in the. (Config: write to XMP sidecar only Use compatible filenames)ġ)Adding a keyword to a jpg photo in dK creates an. On1 displays raw photo keyword correctly.ģ)digiKam, after "Reread Metadata From File" separately for both jpg and raw photos, displays raw photo keyword for both the jpg and raw (rw2) photos.Ĭreate sidecars in digiKam (Windows 6.4.0). Has 2 keyword tag blocks: lr:hierarchicalSubject & dc:subject, both containing the keyword. On1 display jpg photo keyword correctly.Ģ)Adding a keyword to a raw photo in On1 creates a. Appears to have both a jpg and raw (rw2) tag block (is this correct term?). If this is a program issue, is there anything that can be done to fix it (and when)?ġ)Adding a keyword to a jpg photo in On1 creates an.
If I am doing something incorrectly please let me know. In the case of On1 this produces the On1 sidecar format of a ".on1" sidecar (supposedlyįor jpg photos, but see below) and ".xmp"sidecar (supposedly for raw photos, but not apparent in observations below). Looking at just keywords, I thought my problems would be largely answered when I found the configuration option to "Use a compatible file name for writing sidecar files".
ON1 PHOTO RAW SIDECAR FILES SOFTWARE
However, I'm finding problems with the interchange and display of metadata between processing software used in the past and digiKam (and going forward as I curate a growing collection). I would very much like to use digiKam as a DAM for my photo collection.
0 kommentar(er)
